Abstract

BackgroundThe case fatality for intentional self-poisoning in rural Asia is 10–30 times higher than in the West, mostly due to the use of highly toxic poisons. Activated charcoal is a widely available intervention that may – if given early – bind to poisons in the stomach and prevent their absorption. Current guidelines recommend giving a single dose of charcoal (SDAC) if patients arrive within an hour of ingestion. Multiple doses (MDAC) may increase poison elimination at a later time by interrupting any enterohepatic or enterovascular circulations. The effectiveness of SDAC or MDAC is unknown. Since most patients present to hospital after one hour, we considered MDAC to have a higher likelihood of clinical benefit and set up a study to compare MDAC with no charcoal. A third arm of SDAC was added to help determine whether any benefit noted from MDAC resulted from the first dose or all doses.Methods/designWe set up a randomised controlled trial assessing the effectiveness of superactivated charcoal in unselected adult self-poisoning patients admitted to the adult medical wards of three Sri Lankan secondary hospitals. Patients were randomised to standard treatment or standard treatment plus either a single 50 g dose of superactivated charcoal dissolved in 300 ml of water or six doses every four hours. All patients with a history of poison ingestion were approached concerning the study and written informed consent taken from each patient, or their relative (for unconscious patients or those <16 yrs), recruited to the study. The exclusion criteria were: age under 14 yrs; prior treatment with activated charcoal during this poisoning episode; pregnancy; ingestion of a corrosive or hydrocarbon; requirement for oral medication; inability of the medical staff to intubate the patient with a Glasgow Coma Score <13; presentation >72 hrs post-ingestion, and previous recruitment. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality; secondary outcomes included the occurrence of serious complications (need for intubation, time requiring assisted ventilation, fits, cardiac dysrhythmias). Analysis will be on an intention-to-treat basis; the effects of reported time to treatment after poisoning and status on admission will also be assessed.DiscussionThis trial will provide important information on the effectiveness of both single and multiple dose activated charcoal in the forms of poisoning commonly seen in rural Asia. If charcoal is found to be effective, it should be possible to make it widely available across rural Asia in an affordable formulation.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN02920054

Highlights

  • The case fatality for intentional self-poisoning in rural Asia is 10–30 times higher than in the West, mostly due to the use of highly toxic poisons

  • Pesticides are the major problem – the WHO estimates that they cause more than 220,000 deaths globally each year, of which most are due to organophosphorus (OP) insecticides [3]

  • After review of the published RCT and the results of an interim analysis of 595 oleander poisoned patients receiving either single dose of charcoal (SDAC) or MDAC in this trial, the Independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee (IDMEC) decided that it was important to obtain independent verification of the first study's result, and recommended that the trial continue. We set up this RCT in Sri Lanka in early 2002 and recruited the first patient on the 31st March 2002

Read more

Summary

Discussion

If activated charcoal can be proven to be effective, it should be an extremely valuable therapy since it is widely available in the developing world, relatively cheap, binds to many poisons, and safe once the airway is protected. Since the greatest benefit has been seen when charcoal is http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-227X/7/2 given within 15 mins of poisoning,[12] it could be supplied to villages to allow people to give charcoal to their relatives within minutes of the poisoning and before transfer to hospital. If it is found to be ineffective, the many thousands of dollars currently being spent on activated charcoal across Asia could be diverted to more effective interventions. Thereafter, all patients who presented within two hours of a serious ingestion underwent gastric lavage after stabilisation

Background
Methods/design
Eddleston M
Fernando R
13. Chyka PA
Findings
15. Levy G
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call