Abstract

Adsorption cooling technologies driven by low-grade thermal or solar power are used as an energy-efficient alternative to conventional refrigeration and air conditioning systems. Explicit understanding of the adsorption cycles requires precise determination of the performance parameters, replication of the experimental data, and the rigorous study of the adsorption heat transformation method. Hence, the optimum adsorption isotherms model must be identified. Scientists often face difficulties in selecting the suitable isotherm model as there are many models for a particular form of adsorption isotherm. The present study introduces a novel approach for choosing the optimal models for each type of International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) classified adsorption isotherm using robust statistical methods. First, the box-and-whisker plots of error identification are employed. Tóth for Type-I(a) and Type-I(b), modified BET for Type-II, GAB for Type-III, Universal for Type-IV(a), and Type-IV(b), Sun Chakrabarty for Type-V, and Yahia et al. for Type-VI were found lower than the other candidate models in box-and-whisker plot. The optimality of our selected models was further verified using analysis of variance (ANOVA), pairwise Tukey honest significant difference (HSD) test, Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test, and pairwise Wilcoxon rank-sum test. In short, rigorous statistical analysis was performed to identify the best model for each type of isotherm by minimizing error. Moreover, specific cooling effect (SCE) of Maxsorb III/ethanol and silica gel/water pairs were determined. Results showed that Tóth is the optimal isotherm model for the studied pairs, and the SCE values obtained from the model agree well with experimental data. The optimum isotherm model is indispensable for the precise designing of the next generation adsorption cooling cycles.

Highlights

  • The optimum models are confirmed by using robust statistical tests, analysis of variance (ANOVA), Tukey honest significant difference (HSD), and non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis rank-sum test, and Wilcoxon rank-sum test with continuity correction

  • Because the p-value is less than the significance level of 0.01, we can reject the null hypothesis for each type and conclude that some root mean square error deviation (RMSD) means of the models are different

  • Relevant adsorption isotherm pairs for all of the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC) types are chosen for analysis in this study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

It is essential to relate experimental data from various adsorption with different isotherm models in order to reproduce them. Union of pairs with different isotherm models in order to reproduce them. The optimum models for IUPAC classified isotherms were identified using a statistical approach [12]. The subjective choice of the parameter estimates in the GRG approach may affect the candidate models differently. This paper addresses these issues by considering simulation-based sensitivity analysis of the candidate models. (vi) The robustness has been confirmed by determining the specific cooling effect (SCE) of Maxsorb III/ethanol and silica gel/water pairs

Adsorption Isotherm Models
Error Evaluation Function
Simulation Approach
The Box-and-Whisker Plot
Non-Parametric Method
Kruskal–Wallis Rank-Sum Test
Wilcoxon Rank-Sum Test with Continuity Correction
Specific Cooling Effect
Results and Discussion
Box-and-Whisker Plot
Non-Parametric Test
Physical Description with Merit and Demerits of the IUPAC Isotherm Model
Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call