Abstract
The aim of this paper is to investigate the conflict resolution in a large-scale construction projects using multi-attribute decision-making theory and to aggregate group's preference information. Multi-attribute decision analysis theory and flexible theory are integrated with bargaining theory to coordinate controversial issues among stakeholders in construction project when computer-based automated negotiation fails or is terminated by decision-makers in this paper. Therefore, the paper establishes an interactive multi-attribute bargaining decision model for large-scale construction projects. The interactive decision model can make the controversial issue reached an agreement acceptable to all participants by applying concessions in different objectives. Moreover, the final results are inline with the necessary requirement of group decision-making, i.e., maximizing the preference consistency of participants and minimizing the utility gaps between each negotiator's preference and the group's.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
