Abstract
This paper aims at verifying the current Japanese Emergency Response Guideline, especially the notification scheme of Emergency Action Level (EAL), through the analysis of the progress of Fukushima nuclear accident. We compared timing and emergency classification between two data sets of the plant statuses which expressed by the old prediction-based notification and the latest EAL-based notification, in order to assess the current EAL scheme along the effectiveness of protective action for the local residents. We observed that the plant statuses expressed by the current EAL-based notification gave more engineering insights in the earliest accident phase. We also identified a potential improvement area of the guideline in the following severe accident management (SAM) phase after the trigger of first precautionary action, where we are required to reduce uncertainties in both processes of the operator’s notification and the government’s decision-making, in order to compensate for the abstention of utilizing predictive information.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.