Abstract
Urban car ownership in China is fast increasing as the country's urbanization rate and purchasing power improve. Parking difficulties have become one of the key factors affecting and constraining the efficiency of urban economic and social operations. Shared parking is an efficient strategy for addressing urban parking challenges and increasing parking space use. A thorough analysis was conducted on the influencing factors of conflict events in the process of urban shared parking. Based on the conflict information feedback, a dynamic model was proposed in this study for managing and adjusting the access authorization of shared parking spaces. In urban residential settings, this model helps to optimize and reliably control the sharing rate. Furthermore, this study suggested a conflict resolution strategy based on the priority of occupancy rights in response to the main causes of different kinds of shared parking conflicts. This will help to achieve a fair resolution of shared parking conflicts, increase residents' willingness and satisfaction with the shared parking model, and ultimately support the sustainable growth of urban shared parking. The management mechanism and conflict resolution method proposed in this study offer a technological basis for the effective administration and implementation of urban shared parking. © 2024 Institute of Electrical Engineers of Japan and Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.