Study on Bidding Evaluation Method and Bidding Strategy of Construction Project

Abstract

Construction project bidding involving many factors have attracted much attention. According to the tender evaluation method has a higher probability of winning is the angle has been the focus of attention. This article is limited to the theoretical aspects and Bidding Strategy Research Project Bidding Ideally, reasonable legal compliance successful completion of the project tender, tender and has a certain significance. Construction bidding due to large investments, and more involved in terms of factors such as the high-profile construction bidding activities. The following briefly Construction Bid Evaluation Methods in relation to the bidding strategy. First, the construction method of evaluation According to People's Republic of China Bidding Law Article 41: the winning bidder shall meet the following conditions: (1) be able to satisfy all the comprehensive evaluation criteria specified in the tender documents; (2) to meet the tender substantive requirements document, and accredited price; but prices below cost. As can be seen from this provision, there are two main evaluation methods: comprehensive evaluation method, the evaluated price. Below were two kinds of evaluation methods: (A) Comprehensive Evaluation Method Comprehensive evaluation method is characterized by the variety of qualifications related to qualifications, technology, business services and terms are translated into a certain point value, with a total score of 100 points. Evaluation of the bids, bidders for each of the indicators for compliance review, verify and give a score value, and finally, a summary comparison, take the highest score value as the successful bidder. The evaluation, each independent judges after scoring summary scores. This method has the advantage of easy-to-control standard scoring. The difficulty is precisely in this, to be in conformity with the laws and regulations, the development of indicators and evaluation of specific projects fractional value and, after refining the standard is difficult to meet the greatest degree tenderer wishes. The disadvantage is difficult to unified evaluation methods and standards and norms, easily lead to doubts and complaints, the judges too much discretion and the highest bidder winning the like. (B) Evaluated the evaluated price Features review by the evaluated price of qualifications, qualifications, performance and other conditions, to take those who pass by, who failed phase approach, which is to conduct the compliance review, technical indicators in line with further review, then involving bidders variety of technologies, business and services index requirements, in accordance with uniform standards conversion price comparison, and lowest evaluated bid as the successful bidder's way. Under special circumstances, allowing bidders a situation markup (such as the international tender, domestic, domestic supply compared with the direct importers, allowing 15% of the increase). The evaluation, each independent judges comments, summarizing the evaluation conclusions drawn. This method is suitable for the use of financial funds and other mutual funds and carry out procurement tenders, to better reflect the savings through competition, to meet the needs of public procurement purposes and does not violate the laws and regulations under the premise of the principle that best fit the tenderer requirements and wishes; evaluation more scientific, meticulous, each bidder can tell their reasons for not winning. The disadvantage is setting