Study of the position of six volar locking plates for distal radius fracture relative to the watershed line

Abstract

IntroductionVolar plate malpositioning in the treatment of distal radial fracture can lead to tendinitis or even tendon tear, especially when the plate position is very distal. We studied the impact of design on plate position in the distal radius. The primary aim was to compare the position of six volar wrist plates relative to the watershed line using the Soong classification. The secondary objectives were to assess the epidemiology of volar locking plate fixation within the administrative Département of Finistère (northwestern France) and to study whether the type of fracture played a role in plate position. HypothesisThe plate design itself influences positioning relative to the watershed line on the Soong classification. Materials and methodsA total of 2723 volar locking plate fixation cases were analyzed and categorized according to the Soong classification. Plates used were divided into six groups based on design: Zimmer Biomet®, Newclip Technics®, Stryker®, Synthes®, Medartis® and Medartis® Footprint. The number of Soong 0 + 1 plates (i.e., plates graded 0 and 1 taken together) was determined for each design, then compared using the Marascuilo procedure with a significance level of α = 0.05. ResultsOn the Marascuilo procedure, we found significant differences in the number of Soong grade 0 + 1 plates. The Zimmer Biomet and Newclip Technics® plates were significantly more often proximal to the watershed line than the Synthes and Medartis Footprint plates. Plate position with the Medartis® design was significantly more proximal to the watershed line than for its companion design, the Medartis® Footprint plate. The rate of volar locking plate fixation of distal radial fractures over the past 10 years increased in Finistère. Also, the type of fracture affected the choice of plate when different designs were available within a hospital center (Medartis® Footprint plate used in 2R3A fractures). ConclusionOur study highlights a significant difference in volar locking plate position relative to the watershed line between the various models available. Plate design is a deciding factor when treating distal radial fracture, to avoid impingement when implant removal is not routinely planned. Level of evidence3.