Abstract
AbstractA protective oxide layer was formed on the surface of stainless steel by standard industrial‐type thermal treatment. Additional post‐thermal treatment annealing and polishing followed by annealing were applied in an attempt to improve characteristics of the layers. Oxide layers formed on samples without and with different types of post‐thermal treatment processing were analysed and compared. Several techniques were employed. SEM was used to image the surface; AES, XPS and energy‐dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were all used to probe the elemental composition of the oxide layers. AES was also used as the most straightforward method to obtain depth profiles. Low beam energy EDS was used in an attempt to obtain some fast averaged volume information from the layers. XPS was mainly used for determining chemical states on the surface of the sample but not for depth profiling (low sputtering rate due to large illuminated area). Analysed samples differed with regard to surface morphology of the oxide layers, oxide layer compositions and thicknesses. An attempt was made to relate these differences to differences in post‐thermal treatment procedures. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
