Abstract

One of the important inputs while estimating the remaining life of critical components is the fatigue property of materials. Fatigue data, in the form of stress vs. cycles to failure (or) strain vs. cycles to failure (or) fatigue crack growth rate data is used to predict the residual life. Material’s fatigue property degrades with time and usage; hence, it is appropriate to use the current properties for remaining life assessment. Often the quantity of material available for generating fatigue data is limited, especially, if the material is scooped out of existing component of a power plant. Further, fatigue response being probabilistic in nature, requires multiple specimens to be tested at any given stress/strain levels. This has prompted us to develop test procedures to determine the fatigue data of materials from a limited volume of material. This paper presents the results of cyclic ball indentation test method as well as cyclic small punch test method that is used to generate the fatigue data at different stress levels. There are several fine details relating to these test techniques – viz., establishing a equivalent damage criteria for failure life with standard LCF/HCF test specimens. The influence of one of the variables, viz., friction at the specimen-tool interface of a small punch test is investigated through numerical simulation and the results are presented here.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.