STUDY OF ETIOLOGY OF LIVER ABSCESS AND IT'S DIFFERENT WAYS OF MANAGEMENT

Abstract

Background: Liver abscess are cystic, space occupying lesion within liver parenchyma. It has become one of the most common disease with more prevalence in underdeveloped and developing countries. Pyogenic liver abscess more common in western world while amoebic liver abscess are more common in underdeveloped countries and people living with lower socio-economic conditions. Liver abscess, undiagnosed and untreated, has a very high mortality rate. With early diagnosis and prompt institution of specic therapy, the prognosis is good and the mortality is very low. Surgical management was the mainstay for treating liver abscess earlier. However, USG guided percutaneous needle aspiration and percutaneous drainage procedure shown a favorable outcome with less average length of stay in hospital. In this study we aimed to study etiology of liver abscess and its different ways of management. To study the etiology of liver abscess Aim: Materials And Methods: and its different ways of management. This is a prospective, observational study was conducted in GSVM Medical College, LLR & Associated Hospitals, Kanpur (UP).Study was done on 100 patients with different types of liver abscess. Patient with ruptured liver abscess were not included. Outcomes were assessed on the basis of recurrence (with regular follow ups at one month, three months, six months and one year); relieving of symptoms and length of stay in hospital. Results: Out of 100 patients majority of patients were in the age range of 31-45 (56.0%) followed by 46-60 (22.0%) with mean age of 40.74±10.53 years. Most of the cases were males (98%), and females (2.0%). Majority of patients were with lower socioeconomic status (96%). Most of the patient having amoebic liver abscess (66%) with positive ELISA for antibodies, while 34 % of patient having pyogenic liver abscess with 10% having bacterial growth on culture examination having E.coli . 84% of cases having liver abscess in right lobe and were single (66.0%). On the basis of their personal history, comorbidities and clinical features, 14.05 were diabetic, 44.0% were alcoholic, 98% were having fever with 60% cases have chills and rigor and 100% having pain in right upper quadrant. Majority of cases undergone pigt Conclusion: ail treatment were pyogenic (76.4%) and majority of amoebic abscess were treated with aspiration (72.7%) and difference was found statistically signicant with p value of 0.001. Reduction in size of abscess cavity was observed in all the cases but recurrence was higher in conservative treatment (p=0.007) and length of stay was higher in pigtail (p<0.001).