Abstract

Project II is the third case study to be reported on land tenure administration in state-subsidised housing projects the Western Cape which indicate that registration is effective in administering ownership. Internationally, many land titling programmes have not produced the benefits envisaged. In a number of South African state-subsidised housing projects a number of houses have changed hands off-register, which creates costly long-term land tenure administration problems. The Project II study examined the strategies that people use to defend their tenure and to effect transactions in land. While there are major problem cases in South Africa, the Project II study, building on two similar case studies, indicates that individual tenure, registered in ownership, can work in pro-poor housing programmes if the right conditions exist. Although there was evidence of off-register transactions in all three case studies, the situation can be improved by hands on management to create and maintain the enabling conditions for registration to be effective rather than major changes in law, policy and land administration practice. Distinctive, new knowledge, emerging from Project II is how an iconic “bad news” event can influence local knowledge and behaviour.

Highlights

  • The paper examines the effectiveness of official land tenure administration systems, and landholders’ perceptions of these systems in Project II, a state-subsidised housing project on Avondale

  • South African government statistics indicate that 2.8 million housing units and 900,000 serviced sites have been made available through state programmes since 1994 (Department of Human Settlements 2014)

  • It is important to ensure that studies of problem cases are balanced by studies that report what works and what can work with some minor interventions

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The paper examines the effectiveness of official land tenure administration systems, and landholders’ perceptions of these systems in Project II, a state-subsidised housing project on Avondale. It builds on findings from two comparable studies, Projects A & B and Drakenstein-97 (Barry and Roux 2014, 2016). Alternatives to ownership and individual titles, such as the continuum of land rights metaphor and the social tenure domain model have been proposed to address these issues (UN-Habitat /GLTN 2012, Barry 2015) These proposed alternatives carry similar risks of the negative consequences of titling if the right conditions for them to function do not exist. A summary of the general findings from the Projects A & B and Drakenstein-97 cases are presented, followed by a brief history of Avondale and a description and analysis of the Project II study

Theory Building Approach
Methodology
Avondale
Project II
Findings
Analysis and Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call