Abstract
In a case of a dispute between an islamic bank and a customer related to multi-service financing using an ijarah contract at an islamic bank, the customer is suing for the cancellation of the contract on the multi-service financing on the grounds that the object of the contract is not the object of the contract, so the contract should be null and void. However, the court decision stated that he rejected the customer's claim. This research was conducted to examine the application of sharia principles in legal considerations in court decisions regarding contract objects in multi-service financing using the ijarah contract. This research is a normative legal research using the statutory approach method. The results of this study indicate that the legal considerations in court decisions regarding the object of the contract in multi-service financing using the ijarah contract are formally correct, but materially there is still a possibility of gharar that is not in accordance with sharia principles.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
