Study Evaluates CO2 Storage Potential During CO2 Mobility-Control Optimization

Abstract

_ This article, written by JPT Technology Editor Chris Carpenter, contains highlights of paper SPE 212969, “Evaluation of CO2 Storage Potential During CO2 Mobility-Control Optimization for Enhanced Oil Recovery,” by Alvinda Sri Hanamertani, SPE, Ying Yu, SPE, and Omar El-Khatib, SPE, University of Wyoming, et al. The paper has not been peer reviewed. _ CO2 mobility control through foam technology has enabled better sweep efficiency and, consequently, better oil productivity during enhanced oil recovery (EOR) processes. Along with enhancing oil production, a sound potential exists for in-situ generated foam to enhance CO2 storage. However, the effect of the different in-situ foam generation strategies on the combined goal of maximum oil production and carbon storage is not well elucidated in the literature. In the complete paper, the authors methodically evaluate the simultaneous optimization of CO2 storage and oil recovery using multiple injection strategies. Introduction The current investigation is a continuation of two previous studies that provided a methodology for screening and using foaming agents for optimized CO2 storage in sandstone and carbonate formations. A base case of tertiary CO2 flooding was established for comparison with in-situ foam generation by two approaches: single-cycle surfactant-alternating-gas (SAG) flooding and coinjection of CO2 and surfactant. Additionally, the effect of surfactant concentration on foam efficiency, CO2 storage capacity, and oil recovery were evaluated in both approaches at reservoir conditions. Materials and Methods Fluids and Porous Medium. In this study, a synthetic brine with total dissolved solids of 20 wt% was used as blank brine and laden with a commercial zwitterionic surfactant that was used to prepare surfactant solutions with concentrations of 0.5 and 1 wt% active matter in the synthetic brine. Three core plugs were drilled from an Indiana limestone outcrop block. The cores were then cleaned and oven-dried at 95°C. Experimental Procedure. Vacuum saturation with brine was commenced for the three cores. The porosity of the cores was calculated using their dry and brine-saturated weights. Then, the 100% brine-saturated core was placed in a core holder and loaded into an oven set to 90°C. The pore pressure was fixed at 2,000 psi, and the confining pressure was controlled at 3,000 psi throughout the flooding experiment. The brine permeability of the core samples was evaluated by measuring the pressure drop across the core at different brine-injection flow rates. In the first experiment (IL1), oil drainage with a flow rate of 0.2 cm3/min was performed to establish irreducible water saturation of 46.9%. This total flow rate was kept the same throughout the three experiments. Then, a waterflooding stage was begun and the oil recovery was recorded. After reaching a plateau in oil recovery, supercritical CO2 (scCO2) was injected during the EOR process until the oil production plateaued.