Abstract

BackgroundUveal melanoma is characterised by mutations in GNAQ and GNA11, resulting in Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway activation. Treatment with selumetinib (AZD6244, ARRY-142886), a MEK1/2 inhibitor, results in antitumour effects in uveal melanoma pre-clinical models. A randomised phase II trial demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate (RR) with selumetinib monotherapy versus chemotherapy with temozolomide or dacarbazine in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Pre-clinically, selumetinib in combination with alkylating agents enhanced antitumour activity compared with chemotherapy alone. We hypothesise that selumetinib in combination with dacarbazine will result in improved clinical outcomes in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma versus dacarbazine alone.Methods/DesignSUMIT is a randomised, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III study assessing the efficacy and safety of selumetinib in combination with dacarbazine in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma who have not received prior systemic therapy. Primary endpoint is PFS. Secondary endpoints include objective RR, duration of response, change in tumour size at Week 6, overall survival, safety and tolerability. Exploratory endpoints include efficacy in tumours with GNAQ or GNA11 mutations. Eligible patients must have: ≥1 lesion that can be accurately measured at baseline, and is suitable for accurate repeated measurements; ECOG performance status 0–1; life expectancy >12 weeks. Mutation status for GNAQ/GNA11 will be assessed retrospectively.An estimated 128 patients from approximately 50 sites globally will be randomised (3:1) to selumetinib 75 mg twice daily or placebo in combination with dacarbazine 1000 mg/m2 on Day 1 of every 21-day cycle until objective disease progression, intolerable toxicity or occurrence of another discontinuation criterion. Randomisation will be stratified by the presence/absence of liver metastases. Tumours will be evaluated by RECIST v1.1 every 6 weeks. All patients have the option of receiving selumetinib with or without dacarbazine at disease progression. Study enrolment began in April 2014 and is expected to complete in early 2015.DiscussionTreatment of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma represents an area of high unmet medical need. This study evaluating selumetinib in combination with dacarbazine was designed with input from the US FDA, and is the first potential registration trial to be conducted in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.Trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov (Date of registration, October 10, 2013)Registration number: NCT01974752Trial abbreviation: SUMIT

Highlights

  • Uveal melanoma is characterised by mutations in GNAQ and G protein alpha 11 (GNA11), resulting in Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK pathway activation

  • Treatment of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma represents an area of high unmet medical need

  • This study evaluating selumetinib in combination with dacarbazine was designed with input from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and is the first potential registration trial to be conducted in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma

Read more

Summary

Discussion

We hypothesise that selumetinib in combination with dacarbazine will provide improved clinical outcomes versus dacarbazine alone in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma. Dacarbazine is the only chemotherapy approved for use in the treatment of melanoma (NCCN Practice Guidelines in Oncology melanoma version 4.2014 [www.nccn.org/professionals/ physician_gls/pdf/melanoma.pdf]) and is the most commonly prescribed chemotherapy for both metastatic cutaneous and uveal melanoma Taken together, these data provide the rationale for selecting dacarbazine as the combination agent for selumetinib in this study. In the phase II study, 86 % of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma were clinically sufficiently fit to receive selumetinib treatment after experiencing disease progression with temozolomide or dacarbazine. In these patients, efficacy with selumetinib was lower with a median PFS of 8 weeks (95 % CI 8, 12 weeks) compared with 15.9 weeks (95 % CI 8.4, 21.1 weeks) when selumetinib was given initially [34]. Authors’ information Ian Smith is no longer an AstraZeneca employee

Background
Methods/Design
Findings
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call