Abstract

The thyroid nodule is a frequent cause of primary care consultation. The prevalence of a palpable thyroid nodule is approximately 4-7%, increasing up to 67% by the incidental detection of nodules on ultrasound. The vast majority are benign and asymptomatic, staying stable over time. The clinical importance of studying a thyroid nodule is to exclude thyroid cancer, which occurs in 5 to 10% of the nodules. The Board of SOCHED (Chilean Society of Endocrinology and Diabetes) asked the Thyroid Study Group to develop a consensus regarding the diagnostic management of the thyroid nodule in Chile, aimed at non-specialist physicians and adapted to the national reality. To this end, a multidisciplinary group of 31 experts was established among university academics, active researchers with publications on the subject and prominent members of scientific societies of endocrinology, head and neck surgery, pathology and radiology. A total of 14 questions were developed with key aspects for the diagnosis and subsequent referral of patients with thyroid nodules, which were addressed by the participants. In those areas where the evidence was insufficient or the national reality had to be considered, the consensus opinion of the experts was used through the Delphi methodology. The consensus was approved by the SOCHED board for publication.

Highlights

  • The thyroid nodule is a frequent cause of primary care consultation

  • The Board of Sociedad Chilena de Endocrinología y Diabetes (SOCHED) (Chilean Society of Endocrinology and Diabetes) asked the Thyroid Study Group to develop a consensus regarding the diagnostic management of the thyroid nodule in Chile, aimed at non-specialist physicians and adapted to the national reality

  • A multidisciplinary group of 31 experts was established among university academics, active researchers with publications on the subject and prominent members of scientific societies of endocrinology, head and neck surgery, pathology and radiology

Read more

Summary

Indicación de PAAF

< 5 mm, no puncionar, salvo presencia de adenopatías con aspecto de metástasis o extensión extratiroidea, sospecha de compromiso traqueal o de nervio laríngeo recurrente. Nódulo sólido hipoecogénicos con márgenes Cuando sean ≥ de 1 cm bien definidos (SIN microcalcificaciones, extensión extratiroidea o más alto que ancho). Nódulo sólido isoecogénico o hiperecogénico o parcialmente quísticos con áreas sólidas (SIN microcalcificaciones, margen irregular, más alto que ancho o extensión extratiroidea). Muy baja sospecha o TIRADS 2 Espongiformes (aspecto de múltiples microquis- Cuando sean ≥ 2 cm o también se (< 3% de riesgo de malignidad) tes que ocupan > 50% del volumen nodular) o podría solo observar parcialmente quístico

Se debe tener en consideración en la toma de decisiones
BETHESDA VI
Findings
Conclusiones del Consenso
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call