Abstract
The purpose of the study is to assess the apical sealing ability of the endodontic space using two types of canal filling techniques: vertical compaction of warm gutta-percha and AhPlus sealer compared with Resilon and RealSeal SE. Two sets of extracted human teeth were prepared with rotary instruments, each 20 teeth being obturated by the two techniques: the classical and the adhesive root canal filling. The apical leakage of the root canal filling made with Resilon and RealSeal SE was higher than the one with gutta-percha and AhPlus. The difference was statistically significant.
Highlights
AhPlus sealer compared with Resilon
Two sets of extracted human teeth were prepared with rotary instruments
each 20 teeth being obturated by the two techniques
Summary
Study of the apical leakage of the root canal filling made with Guttapercha versus Resilon. Scopul studiului este de a aprecia capacitatea de sigilare apicală a spaţiului endodontic în cazul obturaţiei de canal realizată prin compactare verticală la cald cu gutapercă şi ciment de sigilare AhPlus comparativ cu Resilon şi RealSeal SE. S-au preparat rotativ două grupe de dinţi umani extraşi, obturând câte 20 de dinţi prin cele două tehnici: clasică şi adezivă. Infiltrarea obturaţiei realizată cu Resilon şi RealSeal SE a fost mai mare decât la cea cu gutapercă şi AhPlus, diferenţa fiind semnificativă statistic
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Free) 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
