Abstract

The nature of ground discharge has been investigated using the data of electric field measurement, thunder recording, flash photographing, etc. The height of charge center neutralized by a return stroke was found not to increase with the stroke order in contrast with the report given by Malan and Schonland, instead the stroke channel was often found to progress laterally successively. The existence of a continuing discharge process between and after return stroke has been verified in agreement with the report given by Malan, and Kitagawa et al. The charge neutralized by return strokes in a ground discharge is, on the average, smaller than that neutralized by a cloud discharge. However this does not always mean that the total charge neutralized by a ground discharge is smaller than that of a cloud discharge, because a ground discharge is often accompanied by a continuing discharge process neutralizing considerable amount of negative charge. A new leader stroke which is proposed by us has the structure of corona-like streamers on the top part of the stroke channel. If the electrical structure of a thundercloud in South Africa is the same as that in Japan, the charge height reported by Malan and Schonland seems to be too high and should be reduced to a smaller value.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.