Abstract
The DGHM test for hygienic hand disinfection is based on that of Rotter et al. (1980), and compares the ability of a test agent with 60% isopropanol to reduce Escherichia coli counts on artificially contaminated fingers using 15 volunteers. The test was performed seven times--three with 10% povidone-iodine (PVP-I) scrub, three with 10% PVP-I solution and once with 5% PVP-I solution. Initial tests with PVP-I scrub ('Betadine') gave comparable results with the iso-propanol, but the latter gave an activity below that normally expected, and specified in the Austrian standard (but not in the DGHM test). A repeat test with greater attention to detail gave similar activity with the scrub, but markedly greater activity from the iso-propanol so that the PVP-I scrub failed the test. Subsequent tests with four aqueous PVP-I solutions showed that all passed the tests with activity marginally greater than that of iso-propanol. Interestingly enough, two German formulations of PVP-I solution showed almost identical activity.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.