Abstract

Despite recent evidence suggesting that nerve transfer techniques help improve clinical outcomes, the underlying manner by which collateral-regenerated nerve enters skeletal muscles to restore an organized pattern of the neuromuscular junction (NMJ) is unclear. To construct the animal models of collateral regeneration, the proximal peroneal nerve was fixed to the distal tibial nerve stump. Three months after surgery, the spatial distribution of motor endplates (MEPs) and corresponding in-muscle nerve branches in long flexor digitorum muscles were observed with tissue optical clearing combined with light-sheet microscopy in transgenic fluorescent mice. The results showed that the number of fibers in the proximal donor peroneal nerve was 415 ± 11, while regenerated nerve fibers in the distal tibial stump were 781 ± 43, which indicates a collateral regeneration ratio of 1.88. The spatial distribution of MEPs was restored to an organized pattern of the lamella, and the corresponding in-muscle nerve branches reverted to the normal manner such as after collateral regeneration. Beyond this, the numbers of MEPs dominated by the single distal nerve fiber were 25.58 ± 0.50 and 26.42 ± 0.94, respectively (n = 6, p > 0.05, collateral regeneration group vs. normal group). However, the numbers of distal-regenerated nerve fibers were less than those in normal control groups (781 ± 43 vs. 914 ± 55, n = 6, p < 0.05), and the number and perforations of MEPs were lower than those in normal control groups as such. In summary, this is the first study to show the manner of collateral regeneration of the peripheral nerve that the smaller proximal donor nerve can sprout more axonal buds to connect distal larger nerves and finally restore to an organized pattern of lamella dominated by corresponding in-muscle nerve branches.

Highlights

  • Neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) are important structural and functional interfaces where skeletal muscle fibers receive neurotransmission signals from motor nerve terminals (MNTs) and trigger muscle contraction to perform physical activity (Hoke and Brushart, 2010; Pratt et al, 2013; Dorninger et al, 2017; Li et al, 2018)

  • As the structural basis of the muscular functional recovery following nerve repair, the underlying manner by which collateral-regenerated nerve enters skeletal muscles to restore an organized pattern of NMJ is unclear

  • Quantification of the nerve fiber numbers demonstrated that the numbers of distal tibial nerve fibers and long flexor digitorum (LFD) branches of the tibial nerve fibers were less in the nerve-repaired group than in the normal control group (Table 1) (914 ± 55, 220 ± 6, in the normal control group; 781 ± 43, 180 ± 11, in the nerve-repaired group, p < 0.05)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Neuromuscular junctions (NMJs) are important structural and functional interfaces where skeletal muscle fibers receive neurotransmission signals from motor nerve terminals (MNTs) and trigger muscle contraction to perform physical activity (Hoke and Brushart, 2010; Pratt et al, 2013; Dorninger et al, 2017; Li et al, 2018). Manner of Collateral Regeneration of nerve terminals (Osterloh et al, 2012; Gomez-Sanchez et al, 2017), and as the denervation time increases, the motor endplates (MEPs) become swollen and gradually degenerate, destroying the physiological structure of the NMJs and resulting in the poor functional recovery of skeletal muscles (Rich and Lichtman, 1989). As the structural basis of the muscular functional recovery following nerve repair, the underlying manner by which collateral-regenerated nerve enters skeletal muscles to restore an organized pattern of NMJ is unclear. Despite the collateral-regenerated nerves having a physiological function, the relationship between collateral-regenerated nerves and MEPs remains unclear, which is the fundamental objective for recovering the neurological function of skeletal muscles after nerve repair. A more comprehensive and precise approach is required to reveal the manner of collateral regeneration of the peripheral nerve

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call