Abstract

A number of potential substrates for the microsomal glutathione transferase have been investigated. Out of 11 epoxides tested, only two, i.e. androstenoxide and benzo(a)pyrene-4,5-oxide, were found to be substrates. Upon treatment of the enzyme with N-ethylmaleimide, its activity toward only certain substrates is increased. It appeared upon inspection of the bimolecular rate constants from the corresponding nonenzymatic reactions that the substrates for which the activity is increased are the more reactive ones. This hypothesis was investigated further using a series of para-substituted 1-chloro-2-nitrobenzene derivatives as substrates. Activation was seen only with the more reactive nitro-, aldehyde-, and acetaldehyde-substituted compounds and not with the amide and chloroanalogues, thus demonstrating the predicted effect with a related series of compounds. Interestingly, kcat values are increased 7-20-fold by N-ethylmaleimide treatment, whereas the corresponding kcat/Km value is increased only for the p-nitro derivative. Effective molarity and rate enhancement values were found to increase with decreasing reactivity of the substrate, attaining maximal values of 10(5) M and 10(8), respectively. It is concluded that the glutathione transferases are quite effective catalysts with their less reactive substrates. Hammett rho values for the kcat values of unactivated and activated enzyme were 0.49 and 2.0, respectively. The latter value is close to those found for cytosolic glutathione transferases, indicating that activation changes the catalytic mechanism so that it more closely resembles that of the soluble enzymes. The rho values for kcat/Km values were 3 and 3.5 for the unactivated and activated enzyme, respectively, values close to those observed for the nonenzymatic bimolecular rate constants and thereby demonstrating that these reactions have similar properties. The high coefficients of correlation between resonance sigma- values and all of these parameters demonstrate a strong dependence on substrate electrophilicity, as expected for nucleophilic aromatic substitution.

Highlights

  • A number of potential substrates for thmeicrosomal [1].theglutathione transferases aid inthe detoxication glutathione transferase havebeen investigated

  • Upon examination of a range of substrates, it was found that treatmentof microsomal glutathione transferase with N ethylmaleimide increases its activities with certain substrates only, whereas its activities with other substrates remain unide treatment, whereas the correspondkin,gJK, value changed

  • These puzzling observations were fitted into a is increased only for the p-nitro derivative.Effective hypothesis proposing that activation is seen only with the molarity and rate enhancement values were found to more reactive substrates

Read more

Summary

RESULTS

The nonenzymatic reactivity of the sulfonic acid derivative is in the range of those for the substrates in this series and, it appears likely that. Bimolecular rate constants for the nonenzymatic reaction of different substrates with GSH" and the activities of unactivated and activated microsomalglutathione transferase with these same substrates. The active site of the enzyme cannot accommodate a negative charge. The enzymatic kinetic parameters obtained using 4-chloro3-nitrobenzene derivatives with a range of reactivities

Bimolecular rate constant c
Cumene hydroperoxide
No activation
Rate enhancement
Activated microsomal glutathione transferase'
DISCUSSION
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call