Studies on experimental adjuvanted influenza vaccines: comparison of immune stimulating complexes (Iscoms™) and oil-in-water vaccines

Abstract

Detergent-disrupted influenza virus vaccines, formulated as Iscoms™, or oil-in-water (o/w) emulsions, were administered parenterally to mice and evaluated for immunogenicity and protective efficacy. Both formulations enhanced both primary and secondary serum antibody responses. The magnitude of these responses with o/w emulsions was further enhanced by the addition of the non-ionic block copolymer L121 in the emulsion. Four weeks after primary immunization, mice were challenged by exposure to an aerosol containing infectious virus. Resistance to challenge in terms of survival rate and weight change correlated well with serum antibody titre for all formulations. Two major differences were observed between the adjuvant formulations. Iscom™ vaccines, formulated with Quil-A or the less toxic Quillaia saponin preparation Iscoprep™ 703, induced specific cytotoxic T-lymphocyte responses, whereas the o/w-based vaccines did not. In addition, dose-site reactivity studies in sheep showed that Iscom™ vaccines were less reactive than o/w-based vaccines, the degree of reactivity of the latter increasing sharply with increasing L121 concentration. On the basis of these studies, Iscoms™ were chosen for development as a potential adjuvant for human influenza vaccines.