Abstract

Abstract Puromycin blocked the eosinophil response which is elicited in guinea pig lymph nodes by a single injection of hemocyanin into footpads. The drug was most effective in interfering with the 24-hr response when it was given just before or no later than 4 hr after the antigen. A partial block was noted when the drug preceded the antigen by 2 to 8 hr. Interference with the 15-min vascular response required a higher dose. The secondary type of eosinophil response, which is seen in an immunized animal, was not inhibited by puromycin. The drug was effective when administered into the footpads, but a higher dose was required when it was given by the intraperitoneal route. The results support the notion that the eosinophilia which occurs during the first few minutes of a primary immune response reflects the de novo synthesis of antibody, rather than the presence of preformed antibody.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.