Abstract

Abstract The use of high viscosity gravel pack carrier fluids in gravel packing operations has been an accepted industry practice for more than 20 years. However, experimental results obtained using an acrylic gravel pack simulator indicated completion brines were superior gravel carrier fluids when compared to viscous polymer systems. The low viscosity brines exhibited complete annular packing with very tight grain to grain compaction. The low viscosity systems also provided good perforation filling without the degree of turbulence necessary for intermixing formation and gravel pack sands. Non-viscosified completion brines have been used to complete more than 100 zones with interval lengths of < 10 ft (3.05 m) to 400 ft (121.92 m) and hole angles from vertical to 89 ° (1.55 rad) at depths in excess of 13,000 ft (3,962.4 m). The low viscosity brines have yielded excellent annular packs and exhibited superior perforation packing when compared to polymer carrier fluids. Simulator test results, gravel crushing and erosion tests, and a discussion of "Slurry Pack" versus non-viscosified carrier fluids are presented. Also, comparative field results between polymer fluids and low viscosity brines are also presented in conjunction with recommendations and procedures for gravel placement using non-viscosified completion brines.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.