Abstract

The paper focuses on students’ understanding of the concepts of axial and central symmetries in a plane. Attention is paid to whether students of various ages identify a non-model of an axially symmetrical figure, know that a line segment has two axes of symmetry and a circle has an infinite number of symmetry axes, and are able to construct an image of a given figure in central symmetry. The results presented here were obtained by a quantitative analysis of tests given to nearly 1,500 Czech students, including pre-service mathematics teachers. The paper presents the statistics of the students’ answers, discusses the students’ thought processes and presents some of the students’ original solutions. The data obtained are also analysed with regard to gender differences and to the type of school that students attend. The results show that students have two principal misconceptions: that a rhomboid is an axially symmetrical figure and that a line segment has just one axis of symmetry. Moreover, many of the tested students confused axial and central symmetry. Finally, the possible causes of these errors are considered and recommendations for preventing these errors are given.

Highlights

  • The paper focuses on students’ understanding of the concepts of axial and central symmetries in a plane

  • Isometries are the easiest geometrical transformations and transformations are encountered by people in daily life

  • We consider teaching and understanding the concepts related to isometries to be important at all education levels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The paper focuses on students’ understanding of the concepts of axial and central symmetries in a plane. The results presented here were obtained by a quantitative analysis of tests given to nearly 1,500 Czech students, including pre-service mathematics teachers. The results show that students have two principal misconceptions: that a rhomboid is an axially symmetrical figure and that a line segment has just one axis of symmetry. The possible causes of these errors are considered and recommendations for preventing these errors are given. They were not anchored in the pupil’s experience.’. Similar The analysis of students′ understanding of geometrical problems occur in other countries

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call