Abstract

The present study explores whether students' learning strategies and academic motivation predict persistence and academic success in the first year of higher education. Freshmen students in a professional bachelor program in teacher education were questioned on their learning strategy use and motivation at the start and at the end of the academic year. Students' learning strategies were assessed using the inventory of learning styles-SV. Motivation was measured using scales from the self-regulation questionnaire and the academic motivation scale. Gender and students' prior education were incorporated as control variables. Logistic regression analyses and general linear modelling were applied to predict persistence and academic success, respectively. In each case a stepwise approach in data analysis was used. Results on persistence indicate that lack of regulation and amotivation at the start of the year are significant predictors. For academic success, results showed that relating and structuring, lack of regulation, and lack of motivation at the end of the year are meaningful predictors. Overall, our study demonstrates that learning strategies and motivation have a moderate explanatory value regarding academic success and persistence, and that these effects remain even after controlling for the influence of background variables.

Highlights

  • Institutions for higher education nowadays are confronted with a number of complex, educational difficulties

  • Our study demonstrates that learning strategies and motivation have a moderate explanatory value regarding academic success and persistence, and that these effects remain even after controlling for the influence of background variables

  • The aim of our study was to explore whether or not students’ learning strategies and academic motivation predicted persistence and academic success in the first year of higher education and to investigate whether this predictive value remained after controlling for two background variables, namely gender and prior education

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Institutions for higher education nowadays are confronted with a number of complex, educational difficulties. Meeting the educational needs of this heterogeneous population and increasing retention and throughput rates is an important challenge for higher education [7, 8]. To cope with these challenges, institutions for higher education increasingly devote attention to the support of freshmen students and have begun designing coaching initiatives . Has previous research convincingly demonstrated these factors to be related to study success (e.g., [7, 9,10,11,12,13]), but they seem among the few factors in a broad range of predictors that institutions can actively have an influence on

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call