Abstract

Introduction.In 2016, faculty at the MGH Institute of Health Professions implemented a new Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT) curriculum based on constructivist and cognitive load theories. There is recognition that faculty too often overlook the importance of students' perceptions on the effectiveness of teaching methodologies and that student “buy-in” is particularly pivotal in curricula based on contemporary learning theories. Thus, students' perceptions have become a focus in the higher education research literature. The purpose of this article is to explore the perceptions of the first cohort of DPT students in our new curriculum across their academic studies.Participants.Nineteen of 70 students from the first cohort of our new curriculum participated in 1 of the 3 focus groups in year 1 (round 1) and 1 of the 2 focus groups in year 2 (round 2), with 4 students participating in both rounds.Methods.Qualitative thematic analysis was used to identify, summarize, and interpret students' perceptions regarding their experiences in this new curriculum.Results.Six themes emerging from round 1 were class preparation; plusses and minuses of group learning; usefulness of assessments; managing faculty/course differences; finding life balance; and student performance outcomes. A seventh theme emerged from round 2, namely, evolving and adapting approaches to learning.Discussion and Conclusion.Themes and subthemes are discussed in the context of other studies on students' perceptions of courses and curricula applying contemporary learning theories in higher education. Some of the themes emerging from our study are not unique to DPT curricula based on constructivist theories. However, our findings reflect both positive aspects of such approaches from the students' viewpoints and challenges that should be considered in supporting student engagement when designing or modifying such curricula. Findings may inform DPT programs considering similar curricular shifts toward contemporary learning practices, facilitating program curricular planning and transition processes.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.