Abstract
ABSTRACT Teacher evaluation systems across the United States are increasingly including student surveys as one source of data, but concerns remain about students’ ability to distinguish the multiple dimensions of teaching. We empirically examined this issue in an authentic evaluation system that uses a student survey based on the InTASC framework of teacher effectiveness. Our study addressed the factor structure and reliability of the Teacher Effectiveness Student Survey (TESS) using data from 5,178 surveys. We found that students’ perception of teacher effectiveness is consistent with the theory-based structure of the survey. Of particular importance, it suggests that elementary and secondary students are able to distinguish among different dimensions of teaching. Our results also indicated that TESS has a strong alignment with six InTASC-based teaching standards at both the student and teacher levels. Finally, we found that the aggregate student ratings reflect a reliable measure of the six theory-based teacher effectiveness constructs.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
