Abstract

The validity and reliability of students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness has been debated since the 1970s. One concern is the extent to which the ratings are influenced by halo, and if so, how does halo affect the interpretation of the ratings? This study seeks to assess the degree to which the halo affects the diagnosticity of individual teaching evaluation items. Statistical methods are used to identify and purge the individual item ratings of halo. Three professors are compared using the observed teaching evaluation scores and the observed scores once the halo has been purged. Results indicate that the halo is present in the scores and that the halo does bias the interpretation of teaching effectiveness, especially when the goal is to compare one professor with another.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.