Abstract

In recent years, national reports have called for undergraduate laboratory education that engages students in authentic research experiences. As a result, a number of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) have been developed in biological sciences and some specifically in microbiology. Students benefit from CUREs much like in traditional mentored research experiences, where students carry out independent projects in faculty laboratories. These benefits include increased self-efficacy in research skills, enhanced identification as scientists, and higher graduation rates in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics majors. Because mentored research experiences are not readily available to every student, CUREs represent a potential mechanism to democratize the research experience by providing such opportunities to all students. However, many of existing CUREs described in the literature are designed for advanced undergraduates or are limited to a small number of students. Here, we report student outcomes from a large-enrollment introductory CURE on soil microbiomes that engages students in a real-world context with microbiology. In pre- and post-course surveys, students reported significant gains in self-efficacy on a number of research skills. These results are triangulated with post-course survey data on project ownership, sense of community, and CURE design elements such as collaboration, iteration, discovery, and relevance.

Highlights

  • Research and laboratory experiences are important aspects of undergraduate education in biological sciences

  • We report student outcomes from a course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs) on soil microbiomes situated in a large-enrollment introductory biology laboratory course

  • Research experiences are critical to student learning, as well as identity formation and persistence in STEM, and CUREs in introductory courses can play an important role in promoting student success (President’s Council of Advisors on Science, and Technology [PCAST], 2012)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Research and laboratory experiences are important aspects of undergraduate education in biological sciences. Research experiences lead to improved outcomes for undergraduate students in many domains, such as disciplinary knowledge and competencies, professional and personal skills, identification as scientists, and persistence and time to degree in STEM (Hunter et al, 2006; Kinkel and Henke, 2006; Desai et al, 2008; Edwards et al, 2011; President’s Council of Advisors on Science, and Technology [PCAST], 2012; Horowitz and Christopher, 2013; Palmer et al, 2015). The Association of American Colleges and Universities considers undergraduate research experiences a high-impact educational practice that has been “widely tested and shown to be beneficial of college students from many backgrounds” (Kuh, 2008)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.