Abstract

The sector of higher education in developed countries has been facing important structural changes over the last decade, which is now expanding to developing countries also. As the competitive landscape is changing, the trend of commercialisation of higher education has become more evident. Higher education institutions (H.E.I.s) have been developing their business strategies, with a clear focus on marketing activities, changes in organisational processes, and even changes in their priorities and missions, thus becoming more lucrative. Knowing student behaviour and criteria for choice decisions and recognising the main determinants of students’ choice is the basis for establishing an effective strategy of H.E.I.s. The aim of this article is to shed light on student choice criteria when deciding which institution in higher education to enrol, and to identify main moderating influences. Linear mixed model (L.M.M.) was used as the main methodological tool for analysing the main variation in the attitudes and expectations of students, based on several moderating variables, their socio-demographic and personal characteristics. The results reveal main institutional attributes that HEIs from a post-transitional country can use for the effective market positioning, and the influence of gender, academic aspirations and achievements on the assessment of various students’ choice criteria.

Highlights

  • The global higher education sector has experienced transformational changes in recent decades, mainly in terms of an increased competition in recruiting students and the ‘massification of higher education’ (Briggs & Wilson, 2007; McManus et al, 2017)

  • This criteria is under the influence of the development of the economy, students connect it with a particular H.E.I., as they provide different employment opportunities

  • As Serbia is among European countries with the smallest G.D.P. per capita, it is not expected that this determinant be undervalued

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The global higher education sector has experienced transformational changes in recent decades, mainly in terms of an increased competition in recruiting students and the ‘massification of higher education’ (Briggs & Wilson, 2007; McManus et al, 2017). Serbia shares some similar characteristics in that respect, being a rather unsuccessful example regarding the overall transition processes (Lazic & Cvejic, 2005). Transition in former socialist countries brought formal institutional transformation, (re)introducing the market as the key principle of social and economic organisation. This principle has become one of the cornerstones of the higher education institutions’ (H.E.I.) development strategies (Jungblut & Vukasovic, 2018; Vukasovic, 2014). Being rather unsuccessful in economic transition, Serbia has established a fairly free market in higher education. Institutional transformation in higher education in Serbia has been carried out through the accreditation process in the overall Bologna process implementation, followed by the full implementation of a three-cycle system (bachelor studies, M.S.c. studies and P.h.D. studies) and E.C.T.S. system in all study programmes

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call