Abstract

Retention has been a serious problem for computing programmes in the Computer Science and Creative Technology Department (CSCT) at the University of the West of England (UWE): for example in 2013-14 the BSc (Hons) Computer Science programme lost 18% of its year-one intake. Addressing this, CSCT developed a three-pronged strategy comprising retention research, the monitoring of module performance and the development of a student-at-risk-identification-and-remedial-action-system (SRIRAS). The last initiative was prioritised in 2015-16. An intern team was recruited to run a system to monitor student attendance and academic performance across seven CSCT programmes, identify those students most at risk and then, with the collaboration of programme leaders and year-tutors, help them. Help included phone calls, email warnings, and face-to-face meetings. The latter led to problem identification, advice on non-academic problems, encouragement to attend more lectures, tutorials and peer assisted learning (PAL) sessions, encouragement to engage with module staff, setting up special PAL sessions, and advice to attend catch-up programming sessions. Results indicated that many of those most at risk are struggling with non-academic concerns such as starting the programme late due to a visa problem, or not being able to attend due to a grant not arriving. Results also indicate that some students seem to be being “saved” while others do not. But overall, they indicate that the introduction of the retention system was mixed.

Highlights

  • The context and problem In her 2014 report on undergraduate retention and attainment across the disciplines, Woodfield (2014) reports on disciplinary differences in higher education for the academic year 2010-11. She found that Computer Science was the discipline with the lowest continuation rate (91%)

  • At University of the West of England (UWE), Bristol, this extremely low national continuation rate for the Computer Science discipline has been observed for the ten computing programmes in the Computer Science and Creative Technology (CSCT) Department, including for the BSc (Hons) Computer Science programme itself

  • The two key roles for running the SRIRAS are those of the Retention Coordinator (RC) and the Programme Leader (PL)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The two key roles for running the SRIRAS are those of the Retention Coordinator (RC) and the Programme Leader (PL). Retention coordinator’s role The RC acquired the following data for each student on each of the ten CSCT programmes: Attendance data VLE (Blackboard) engagement data Formative and summative assessment results. Students at critical risk were judged to be those who were failing to attend nearly everything and performing poorly academically in everything. For just the Computer Science programme, table 2 presents the academic performance of each student on the programme identified as critically at risk during the year. This data was gleaned either from email replies or from face-to-face interviews. Had to work fulltime Missed first four weeks Missed first two weeks Transferred to BSc (Hons) Digital Media Transferred to BSc (Hons) Architectural Design and Technology Severe depression Suicidal Transferred to Korean Studies at Sheffield University Couldn’t find suitable accommodation

Findings
Discussion
Summary
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call