Structure Prediction for Alternatively Spliced Proteins

Abstract

The abundance of different protein variants generated by alternative splicing (AS) is not fully represented in the Protein Structure Database (PDB). Among the already limited set of proteins with experimentally determined structures deposited in PDB, only a small fraction have structures ofmore than one splicing variant. In the absence of experimental data, computational methods can be used to predict the structure of protein isoforms. In this chapter, the established approaches to computational protein structure prediction will be briefly described, and their use for studying differences that result from AS will be detailed. In particular, it will be noted when a reliable structural model can be obtained for a given protein sequence. Topics of finding the best template structures for modeling individual protein domains, predicting the structure of long, multidomain proteins, and assessing the quality of theoretical models, together with error correction, will also be addressed. The suggested protocol will be illustrated by the structure prediction of isoform C of phosphotyrosine phosphatase (LMPTP-C). 54.1 Theoretical Background In 1961, based on studies with ribonuclease A, Christian Anfinsen hypothesized that the structure of a protein in its native environment would be determined by the protein’s amino acid sequence, and that this native conformation is the one in which the Gibbs free energy of the system is lowest [1]. Since then, the prediction of a protein’s structure from its amino acid sequence has become the “holy grail” of computational biology. However, despite great efforts having been made, a universal algorithm with which to infer protein structure has not yet been developed. Nonetheless, several methods have been developed that can provide useful models, depending on a variety of conditions. There are two major approaches for protein structure prediction. The first approach, termed “comparative modeling” or “template-based modeling,” is based on the experimental observation that evolutionarily related proteins usually retain similar structures, despite an accumulation of substitutions at the level of amino acid sequence, and that the structure changes very slowly compared to the sequence [2]. Thus, an experimentally determined structure of one protein can be used as a template to model the structure of another related protein (a modeling target) by simulating the process of evolution at the sequence level.Modification of the template to “transmute” it into the target requires only limited computation. Therefore, comparative modeling does not require special computer resources, and can be easily carried out on a personal workstation using computer programs that are simple to install and use. Template-based modeling requires that, for a given target sequence, a structurally similar template is identified, and a correct target–template sequence alignment is Alternative pre-mRNA Splicing: Theory and Protocols, First Edition. Edited by Stefan Stamm, Chris Smith, and Reinhard Luhrmann. 2012 Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. Published 2012 by Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. j 583