Abstract

We consider the UV divergences up to sub-subleading order for the four-point on-shell scattering amplitudes in $D=8$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory in the planar limit. We trace how the leading, subleading, etc divergences appear in all orders of perturbation theory. The structure of these divergences is typical for any local quantum field theory independently on renormalizability. We show how the generalized renormalization group equations allow one to evaluate the leading, subleading, etc. contributions in all orders of perturbation theory starting from one-, two-, etc. loop diagrams respectively. We focus then on subtraction scheme dependence of the results and show that in full analogy with renormalizable theories the scheme dependence can be absorbed into the redefinition of the couplings. The only difference is that the role of the couplings play dimensionless combinations like ${g}^{2}{s}^{2}$ or ${g}^{2}{t}^{2}$, where $s$ and $t$ are the Mandelstam variables.

Highlights

  • In recent years maximally supersymmetric gauge theories attracted much attention and served as a theoretical playground promising new insight in to the nature of gauge theories beyond usual perturbation theory

  • We show how the generalized renormalization group equations allow one to evaluate the leading, subleading, etc. contributions in all orders of perturbation theory starting from one, two, etc. loop diagrams respectively

  • In this paper we summarize all previous results with addition of the sub-subleading case and focus on the scheme dependence of the counter terms

Read more

Summary

INTRODUCTION

In recent years maximally supersymmetric gauge theories attracted much attention and served as a theoretical playground promising new insight in to the nature of gauge theories beyond usual perturbation theory. It is useful to write down the local expression for the KR0 terms (counterterms) equal to KR0 This means that performing the R0-operation one can take care only of the one-, two-, three-loop diagrams surviving after contraction and get the desired leading pole terms via Eq (3) in the leading, subleading and sub-subleading order, respectively. They can be calculated in all loops pure algebraically. As in the ladder case, this recurrence relation takes into account all the diagrams of a given order of PT and allows one to sum all from n o1⁄4rd2ertsooifnPfiTn.itTyh. iDs ceannotbinegacthhieevseudmbybymuΣlðtsip;lty; iznÞg1⁄4boPth∞ns1⁄4id eSsnðosf;EtÞqð.−(1zÞ3n), by ð−zÞn−1, we where z get the g2 ε and summing up following differential equation. One can not just remove the UV regularization and get a finite theory

THE SCHEME DEPENDENCE
The subleading case
The sub-subleading case
CONCLUSION

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.