Abstract

Abstract. We study the characteristics of a statistical ensemble of mesoscale simulations in order to estimate the model error in the simulation of CO2 concentrations. The ensemble consists of ten members and the reference simulation using the operationnal short range forecast PEARP, perturbed using the Singular Vector technique. We then used this ensemble of simulations as the initial and boundary conditions for the meso scale model (Méso-NH) simulations, which uses CO2 fluxes from the ISBA-A-gs land surface model. The final ensemble represents the model dependence to the boundary conditions, conserving the physical properties of the dynamical schemes, but excluding the intrinsic error of the model. First, the variance of our ensemble is estimated over the domain, with associated spatial and temporal correlations. Second, we extract the signal from noisy horizontal correlations, due to the limited size ensemble, using diffusion equation modelling. The computational cost of such ensemble limits the number of members (simulations) especially when running online the carbon flux and the atmospheric models. In the theory, 50 to 100 members would be required to explore the overall sensitivity of the ensemble. The present diffusion model allows us to extract a significant part of the noisy error, and makes this study feasable with a limited number of simulations. Finally, we compute the diagonal and non-diagonal terms of the observation error covariance matrix and introduced it into our CO2 flux matrix inversion for 18 days of the 2005 intensive campaign CERES over the South West of France. Variances are based on model-data mismatch to ensure we treat model bias as well as ensemble dispersion, whereas spatial and temporal covariances are estimated with our method. The horizontal structure of the ensemble variance manifests the discontinuities of the mesoscale structures during the day, but remains locally driven during the night. On the vertical, surface layer variance shows large correlations with the upper levels in the boundary layer (> 0.6), dropping to 0.4 with the lower levels of the free troposphere. Large temporal correlations were found during the afternoon (> 0.5 for several hours), reduced during the night. The diffusion equation model extracted relevant error covariance signals horizontally, with reduced correlations over mountain areas and during the night over the continent. The posterior error reduction on the inverted CO2 fluxes accounting for the model error correlations illustrates the predominance of the temporal over the spatial correlations when using tower-based CO2 concentration observations.

Highlights

  • Atmospheric inversions are a widely-used tool for the quantification of surface sources for CO2 (e.g. Gurney et al, 2002; Rayner et al, 2008), for CH4 (Bousquet et al, 2006) and for CO (Petron et al, 2002)

  • The outline of the paper is as follows: Starting from the mesoscale ensemble of simulations, (i) we estimated the variance with its spatio-temporal correlations; (ii) we modelled the horizontal correlations by using the diffusion equation to filter the noise of our limited size ensemble; and (iii) we tested the combined spatio-temporal observation covariance matrix in our CO2 flux matrix inversion

  • The dynamical fields in Lagrangian Particle Dispersion Model (LPDM) are forced by mean winds (u,v, w), potential temperature, and turbulent kinetic energy (TKE)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Atmospheric inversions are a widely-used tool for the quantification of surface sources for CO2 (e.g. Gurney et al, 2002; Rayner et al, 2008), for CH4 (Bousquet et al, 2006) and for CO (Petron et al, 2002). The model uncertainty describes the statistics of the difference between a simulation and the true value that would be observed if the real atmosphere was forced with the same fluxes as the model. The importance of this depends on the magnitude and structure of concentration variability in the atmosphere and we can attempt to quantify it with highresolution models (e.g. Corbin and Denning, 2006; Corbin et al, 2008) or with spatially dense measurements (e.g. Gerbig et al, 2003) Such direct comparison using radiosonde’s was performed at larger scale (Gerbig et al, 2008) but requires a sufficiently large number of observations over the domain. We calculate the ensemble statistics of transport error on the domain of the CarboEurope Regional Experiment Strategy (CERES) (Dolman et al, 2006; Lauvaux et al, 2008) At this scale we can compare the ensemble behaviour with other measures of the model-data mismatch such as the variability in measured concentrations (Gerbig et al, 2003). We discuss the implications for network design, and optimal spatial and temporal densities of measurements

Models and diffusion equation filtering
Models
Generation of the ensemble
Observation error covariance estimation by diffusion equation modelling
Vertical and temporal correlations
Pseudo-flux inversion and spatial error correlations
Combining temporal and spatial correlations
Atmospheric CO2 variability over the domain
Temporal error correlations
Impact of the modelled covariances on the inversion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call