Abstract

The number of avian species in urban areas throughout the world, particularly in Europe and the USA is low; however, their total density is higher than that observed in surrounding habitats. Nevertheless, it has not been confirmed whether this is true in Japan. Japanese cities have fewer green areas than European and American cities, and Japanese suburbs are likely to face forests on mountain slopes, whereas cities in most other countries face open grasslands, rural areas, or flatlands. These differences could influence the structure of avian diversity from city to native habitat. We compared the number of species and individuals of all species among city centers, suburbs, and forested areas in Japan. Similar to other countries, the structure of avian communities in Japanese cities was dominated by a handful of species, and total abundance was highest among the other environments. This suggests that the underlying mechanism determining the structure of the avian community is the same between Japan and other previously studied countries. However, species richness was not the highest in the intermediate areas, which is typical in Europe and the USA. This is because suburbs face forested areas and moderately urbanized areas are scarce in the study area. The lack of intermediate area is moderately typical in Japan. This difference is important not only for managing avian diversity but also total diversity from the city to native habitats in Japan.

Highlights

  • Expanding urban areas are increasing worldwide (Angel et al 2005; McDonald et al 2008)

  • What has become clear is that the number of species in urban areas is low but the total density of birds is higher than that observed in surrounding habitats (Clergeau et al 1998; Shochat et al 2006; Luck and Smallbone 2010)

  • The mean number of species was greatest in order of city center \ suburb \ forested area; the mean value in city centers was significantly lower than the null model and that in the forested areas significantly larger than the null model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Expanding urban areas are increasing worldwide (Angel et al 2005; McDonald et al 2008). Many studies have tried to measure the degree of fragmentation and identify ways to minimize it (Grimm et al 2008) In these studies, bird-community structures (e.g., species richness and number of individuals) along a gradient of urbanization (e.g., from city centers to the native zone) have often been considered an index of the influence of urbanization on biodiversity (Palomino and Carrascal 2006) and, have been well researched. What has become clear is that the number of species in urban areas is low but the total density of birds is higher than that observed in surrounding habitats (Clergeau et al 1998; Shochat et al 2006; Luck and Smallbone 2010) This pattern deviates from that observed in less human-influenced habitats, where the total number of individuals usually positively correlates with species richness. As a mechanism for creating this urban-specific pattern, Marzluff (2001) suggested that

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call