Abstract

The Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) have been implemented as performance and research measures for youth mental health services in the UK and elsewhere. However, the factor structure of this instrument has not yet been reported. Clinician ratings from a representative sample of 1335 young people seen by community-based Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services were randomised into exploratory and confirmatory datasets. Parallel analysis followed by an exploratory factor analysis was performed on the former ratings. The potential structures elicited were tested using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA). The resulting structures were evaluated in the confirmatory dataset. On CFA a five-factor model with one cross-loading item provided the best fit to the data. However, the internal reliability consistency of some of the postulated subscales was poor. We conclude that the HoNOSCA is a multidimensional measure with a three-factor structure possibly providing the optimum compromise between fit and internal reliability. Thus, it may be most appropriate to summarise clinical outcomes using two symptom subscores, relating to behavioural and emotional problems, rather than using the total scores, as is current practice. Such subscales may be more sensitive to change than total summed scores.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.