Abstract

Overexpression of rab5 via a Sindbis virus vector resulted in a 2-3-fold stimulation of horseradish peroxidase uptake in BHK-21 cells. Based on this functional assay of rab5 activity, we conducted extensive mutational analysis of the structure-function relationship of rab5. A total of 21 deletion and substitution mutations were created and their effects on rab5 activity were examined. Deletion of the entire C-terminal tetrapeptide motif CCSN abolished rab5 activity. A mutant with the last three residues deleted, however, showed residual rab5 activity. Truncation of only two residues from the C terminus had no effect on the biological activity of rab5. A mutant containing a 4-residue deletion from the N terminus retained full activity in comparison with wild-type rab5. N-terminal deletion of 19 residues only partially blocked rab5 activity. Substitution mutations in the guanine nucleotide binding motifs showed dramatic effects on rab5 function. In addition to the previously reported N133I mutation, the S34N mutation also resulted in a guanine nucleotide binding defective form that was a dominant inhibitor of endogenous rab5 activity. The Q79L mutation (the ras equivalent Q61L decreases intrinsic and GTPase-activating protein-stimulated GTPase activities), however, had no effect on rab5 activity. The S35N mutation, which is immediately downstream of the first GTP/GDP binding motif, decreased guanine nucleotide binding by approximately 4-fold and partially inactivated rab5. Mutations in several other conserved residues (K22A, F57Y, and R81A) also resulted in partial loss of rab5 activity. Eight mutations in and around the putative effector domain had little effect on rab5 activity. In light of these data, the structure-function relationship of rab5 is discussed and compared with that of ras, the prototype of small GTPases.

Highlights

  • Overexpression of rub5 via a Sindbis virus vector re- terminal CAAX motif (A is an aliphatic amino acid residue, sulted in a 2-3-fold stimulation of horseradish peroxi- whereas X can be any residue) serves asa recognition site for dase uptake in BHK-21 cells

  • Were created and their effects on rub5 activity were ex- and “off” states, which is facilitated by guanine nucleotide examined

  • In addition to the previously nization and intracellularvesicle transport, respectively (1,10, reported N1331 mutation, the S34N mutation re- 11).These functional differences result from their structural sulted in a guanine nucleotide binding defective form differences. rub shares approximately 30% sequence identity that was a dominant inhibitor of endogenousrub5 activ- with rus, most of which are clustered within thefour GTP/GDP

Read more

Summary

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Mutagenesis of rab5”All DNA manipulation was conducted according tostandard methods [20].The plasmids containingcDNA sequences of rab, rab, rab, and rub were provided by Dr A. Rub mutants, the corresponding cDNAs were amplified byPCR Both primers contained 5' XbaI linkers. Rub and rub mutants were expressed at a small plasmid pGC2 [21]which was linearized previously by XbaI and high levels as glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins in the Eschtreated with calf intestinal alkali phosphatase. Which was linearized previously by XbaI digestion and treated with calf The membrane was incubated for 1 h at room temperature in PBS intestinal alkali phosphatase. GTP binding was conducted at room temperature for designed so that they corresponded to different N- and C-terminal se- 1 h in PBS containing 0.1% Tween 20, 5 mM MgCI,, and 10 pCi of quences in the rub cDNA. Leted byPCR.By using different combinations of 5' and 3' primers, mutant rub cDNAs containing nested deletions from eithertheN

RESULTS
RabSAN4
19 DTAGQE t t
DISCUSSION
A Ras efffmor domain
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call