Abstract

Greige cotton (GC) has attracted interest in recent years as an eco-friendly, functional fiber for use in nonwoven topsheet materials. GC imparts favorable fluid management and sensorial properties associated with urinary liquid transport and indices related to comfort in wearable incontinence nonwovens. Nonwoven GC has material surface polarity, an ambient moisture content, and a lipid/polysaccharide matrix that imparts positive fluid mechanic properties applicable to incontinence management topsheet materials. However, a better understanding of the connection between functionality and compositional aspects of molecular, mechanical, and material property relations is still required to employ structure/function relations beyond a priori design. Thus, this study focuses on the relation of key indices of material fluid and sensorial functions to nonwoven topsheet composition. Greige cotton, polypropylene, bleached cotton, and polyester fiber blends were hydroentangled at 60, 80, and 100 bar. Greige cotton polypropylene and bleached cotton were blended at ratios to balance surface polarity, whereas low percentages of polyester were added to confer whiteness properties. Electrokinetic and contact angle measurements were obtained for the hydroentangled nonwovens to assess surface polarity in light of material composition. Notably, materials demonstrated a relation of hydrophobicity to swelling as determined electrokinetically by Δζ, ζplateau, and contact angles greater than 90°. Subsequently, three blended nonwoven fabrics were selected to assess effects on fluid management properties including topsheet performance indices of rewet, strikethrough, and fluid handling (rate and efficiency of transport to the absorbent core). These materials aligned well with commercial topsheet fluid mechanics. Using the Leeds University Fabric Handle Evaluation System (LUFHES), the nonwovens were tested for total fabric hand. The results of the LUFHES measurements are discussed in light of fiber contributions. Fiber ratios were found to correlate well with improvement in softness, flexibility, and formability. This study provides insights that improves the understanding of the multifunctional properties accessible with greige cotton toward decisions valuable to selecting greige cotton as an environmentally friendly fiber for nonwoven topsheets.

Highlights

  • Most incontinence topsheet manufacturers have used polypropylene (PP), which isFor decades, most incontinence topsheet manufacturers have used polypropylene (PP), which is hydrophobic and less expensive than greige cotton

  • After a defined volume of liquid upon strikethrough time a involves determining the time taken for aapplying known volume of test liquidsample applied to the surface of a time test piece of a nonwoven topsheet, which is is in applied contact with underlying the prepared, simulated baby weight onto the specimen at standard absorbent pads time

  • Fiber ratios demonstrated a relation of hydrophobicity to swelling, as determined electrokinetically by isoelectric point

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Most incontinence topsheet manufacturers have used polypropylene (PP), which is. PP by blending greige cotton fiber and achieve improved liquid handling and comfort. Impact from PP by blending greige cotton fiber and achieve improved liquid handling and comfort. Assessment of tactile comfort at the skin–fabric interface strives to improve the objective and subjective evaluations of fabric handle. The structure/function relationship has not been elucidated sufficiently to predict cotton fiber substitution effects in topsheet design This needs to be done in light of recent results that document the utilization of blue polyester fiber to improve nonwoven whiteness [27]. Molecular surface properties are linked to fabric hand and fluid management mechanics, with the goal of designing and developing incontinence products with robust fluid handling and improved fabric hand

Materials
Design and Selection of Fabric
Fabric Whiteness
Electrokinetic and Contact Angle Analysis in View of Topsheet Layer Function
As shown
Analysis of the Fabric Tactile Properties
Softness
Crispiness and Smoothness
Discussion
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call