Structure and substance in functional discourse grammar: the case of the binominal noun phrase

Abstract

This paper discusses the relevance of the distinctions made by Hjelmslev ([1943] 1961), between purport, substance and structure on the one hand, and content and expression on the other, for the theory of Functional Discourse Grammar (FDG). It is shown that FDG, as a form-oriented theory, shares a number of aspects with Hjelmslev’s model; at the same time, however, it is argued that, as a function-to-form theory, FDG assigns a much more important role to the notion of substance. Three major differences between the two approaches are identified, concerning (i) directionality in the model (between substance and structure), (ii) motivation (of structure on the basis of substance) and (iii) the difference between “structure” (in the form of more or less stable primitives) and “structuring” (as a process). Subsequently, a corpus-based, diachronic analysis of the use, form and development of a number of related binominal noun phrases with the head noun beast (e.g. a beast of a party) is offered to illustrate the FDG interpretation of the distinction between substance and structure, and to justify the greater importance attributed to the notion of substance. It is concluded that compared to Hjelmslev’s model, FDG is better equipped, both diachronically and synchronically, to deal with the specific features of and relations between the four types of binominal construction discussed in the paper.