Abstract
The co-location and networking of firms and institutions, also known as clustering, positively influences the innovativeness of firms. The cluster literature provides a single-sided understanding of how clusters function due to an overemphasis in the literature on clusters in high-tech and developed economies at the expense of clusters in low-tech industries in less-developed regions. Applying social network analysis (SNA), this paper studies two furniture clusters in the Wielkopolska region of Poland. The findings demonstrate that: (1) the critical factor is the impact of institutionalization on the mechanisms of knowledge flows, Marshall’s externalities and, in consequence, innovativeness of firms; and (2) the underlining clusters do not show a tendency to build cluster-external linkages, opposing the dominant premise in the cluster literature. In the absence of national and international relations, managers of small and medium-sized firms and local institutions are the main sources of novelty for the clusters at the sustaining stage of their life cycle. The findings pave the way for initiatives aiming at creating and developing knowledge networks in lagging and catching-up regions in Europe, particularly those specialized in low-tech sectors.
Highlights
The co-location of firms and institutions, known as clusters, positively influences informal interactions, learning and cooperative local networks (Audretsch & Feldman, 1996)
Applying social network analysis (SNA), this paper studies two furniture clusters in the Wielkopolska region of Poland
The findings demonstrate that: (1) the critical factor is the impact of institutionalization on the mechanisms of knowledge flows, Marshall’s externalities and, in consequence, innovativeness of firms; and (2) the underlining clusters do not show a tendency to build cluster-external linkages, opposing the dominant premise in the cluster literature
Summary
The co-location of firms and institutions, known as clusters, positively influences informal interactions, learning and cooperative local networks (Audretsch & Feldman, 1996). Social networks in clusters are widely considered the driving forces of knowledge sourcing and innovation (Boschma & Ter Wal, 2007). This paper seeks to answer two questions: (1) How do knowledge networks differ depending on the institutionalization of cooperation in a given low-tech cluster? (2) How does the position in the knowledge network impact the innovativeness of the firms? They are answered by studying two furniture clusters in Wielkopolska in western Poland, using social network analysis (SNA) as a research method This paper seeks to answer two questions: (1) How do knowledge networks differ depending on the institutionalization of cooperation in a given low-tech cluster? (2) How does the position in the knowledge network impact the innovativeness of the firms? They are answered by studying two furniture clusters in Wielkopolska in western Poland, using social network analysis (SNA) as a research method
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
