Abstract

Structure-function relationships in tendons are directly influenced by the arrangement of collagen fibres. However, the details of such arrangements in functionally distinct tendons remain obscure. This study demonstrates the use of quantitative polarised light microscopy (qPLM) to identify structural differences in two major tendon compartments at the mesoscale: fascicles and interfascicular matrix (IFM). It contrasts functionally distinct positional and energy storing tendons, and considers changes with age. Of particular note, the technique facilitates the analysis of crimp parameters, in which cutting direction artefact can be accounted for and eliminated, enabling the first detailed analysis of crimp parameters across functionally distinct tendons.IFM shows lower birefringence (0.0013 ± 0.0001 [−]), as compared to fascicles (0.0044 ± 0.0005 [−]), indicating that the volume fraction of fibres must be substantially lower in the IFM. Interestingly, no evidence of distinct fibre directional dispersions between equine energy storing superficial digital flexor tendons (SDFTs) and positional common digital extensor tendons (CDETs) were noted, suggesting either more subtle structural differences between tendon types or changes focused in the non-collagenous components.By contrast, collagen crimp characteristics are strongly tendon type specific, indicating crimp specialisation is crucial in the respective mechanical function. SDFTs showed much finer crimp (21.1 ± 5.5 µm) than positional CDETs (135.4 ± 20.1 µm). Further, tendon crimp was finer in injured tendon, as compared to its healthy equivalents. Crimp angle differed strongly between tendon types as well, with average of 6.5 ± 1.4° in SDFTs and 13.1 ± 2.0° in CDETs, highlighting a substantially tighter crimp in the SDFT, likely contributing to its effective recoil capacity. Statement of SignificanceThis is the first study to quantify birefringence in fascicles and interfascicular matrix of functionally distinct energy storing and positional tendons. It adopts a novel method – quantitative polarised light microscopy (qPLM) to measure collagen crimp angle, avoiding artefacts related to the direction of histological sectioning, and provides the first direct comparison of crimp characteristics of functionally distinct tendons of various ages.A comparison of matched picrosirius red stained and unstained tendons sections identified non-homogenous staining effects, and leads us to recommend that only unstained sections are analysed in the quantitative manner.qPLM is successfully used to assess birefringence in soft tissue sections, offering a promising tool for investigating the structural arrangements of fibres in (soft) tissues and other composite materials.

Highlights

  • The structure of complex materials is closely related to their function and mechanical properties and vice versa

  • This study demonstrates the use of quantitative polarised light microscopy to identify structural differences in two major tendon compartments at the mesoscale: fascicles and interfascicular matrix (IFM)

  • It adopts a novel method to measure collagen crimp angle, avoiding the artefacts related to histological sectioning, and provides direct comparison of the crimp characteristics of functionally distinct tendons of various ages

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The structure of complex materials is closely related to their function and mechanical properties and vice versa. Collagenous tissues are no exception, there is considerable interest in understanding the mechanical performance of tissues, based on studying the details of their composition and structural arrangement. Tendon is a highly ordered unidirectional fibrous composite, consisting mainly of hierarchically organised collagen type I molecules. Collagen is the most abundant protein and main load-bearing constituent of tendons and many other tissues. It attains its mechanical properties through hierarchical assembly. In tendon this spans from the tropocollagen triple helix at the molecular level, to collagen fibrils, fibres, fascicles, fascicle bundles and whole tendons [1]. At each hierarchical level the collagenous matrix is interspersed with a non-collagenous matrix, rich in proteoglycans [2]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.