Abstract
Direct inhibition of GPX4 requires covalent modification of the active-site selenocysteine. While phenotypic screening has revealed that activated alkyl chlorides and masked nitrile oxides can inhibit GPX4 covalently, a systematic assessment of potential electrophilic warheads with the capacity to inhibit cellular GPX4 has been lacking. Here, we survey more than 25 electrophilic warheads across several distinct GPX4-targeting scaffolds. We find that electrophiles with attenuated reactivity compared to chloroacetamides are unable to inhibit GPX4 despite the expected nucleophilicity of the selenocysteine residue. However, highly reactive propiolamides we uncover in this study can substitute for chloroacetamide and nitroisoxazole warheads in GPX4 inhibitors. Our observations suggest that electrophile masking strategies, including those we describe for propiolamide- and nitrile-oxide-based warheads, may be promising for the development of improved covalent GPX4 inhibitors.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
