Abstract
The structure of $({\mathrm{C}}_{60}{)}_{n}$ clusters $(n=1--150)$ was investigated by heating them to definite temperatures in a helium bath (heating cell) with subsequent characterization in a time-of-flight mass spectrometer. The intensity anomalies in the resulting mass spectra reflect particularly stable configurations that resisted evaporation. However, the set of enhanced peaks (magic numbers) turned out to be temperature dependent. Clusters heated to a moderate temperature of 490 K yielded mass spectra indicating the presence of icosahedral structures that can be characterized by a set of unusually strong peaks, namely $n=13,19,23,26,35,39,43,46,49,55,55+3m,116,125,131,137,$ and $147 (m=1--14).$ Based on constant-temperature molecular dynamics simulations it could be concluded that these icosahedra represent metastable structures that had not yet attained thermal equilibrium on the experimental time scale ${(t}_{s}=0.5 \mathrm{ms}).$ Only when the $({\mathrm{C}}_{60}{)}_{n}$ clusters were heated to appreciably higher temperatures they could reach thermodynamical equilibrium, manifested by a thermally induced structural transition into close-packed structures, decahedral structures and structures based on the 98-Leary tetrahedron. Thus, mass spectra of clusters heated to 600 K demonstrate the new set of magic numbers, $n=38,48,58,61,64,68,71,75,77,84,89,91,96,$ and 98. Additionally, the experimental arrangement used allows both charged and neutral $({\mathrm{C}}_{60}{)}_{n}$ clusters to be studied. Thereby, it was possible to show that the structure of large $({\mathrm{C}}_{60}{)}_{n}$ clusters is insensitive to their charge state $(\ensuremath{-}/n/+),$ disproving a hypothesis that has been discussed in the literature for several years. The heating cell was also used to study the thermally induced dissociation in the fullerene dimers $({\mathrm{C}}_{60}{)}_{2},$ $({\mathrm{C}}_{70}{)}_{2},$ and $({\mathrm{C}}_{60}{)}_{2}^{+}.$ The dissociation energies were determined to be 0.275 eV, 0.313 eV, and 0.37 eV, respectively $(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}0.08 \mathrm{eV}).$
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
