Abstract
We have performed 2D bulge/bar/disc decompositions using g, r and i-band images of a representative sample of nearly 1000 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. We show that the Petrosian concentration index is a better proxy for the bulge-to-total ratio than the global Sérsic index. We show that pseudo-bulges can be distinguished from classical bulges as outliers in the Kormendy relation. We provide the structural parameters and distributions of stellar masses of ellipticals, classical bulges, pseudo-bulges, discs and bars, and find that 32 per cent of the total stellar mass in massive galaxies in the local universe is contained in ellipticals, 36 per cent in discs, 25 per cent in classical bulges, 3 per cent in pseudo-bulges and 4 per cent in bars. Pseudo-bulges are currently undergoing intense star formation activity and populate the blue cloud of the colour–magnitude diagram. Most (though not all) classical bulges are quiescent and populate the red sequence of the diagram. Classical bulges follow a correlation between the bulge Sérsic index and bulge-to-total ratio, while pseudo-bulges do not. In addition, for a fixed bulge-to-total ratio, pseudo-bulges are less concentrated than classical bulges. Pseudo-bulges follow a mass–size relation similar to that followed by bars, and different from that followed by classical bulges. In the fundamental plane, pseudo-bulges occupy the same locus as discs. While these results point out different formation processes for classical and pseudo-bulges, we also find a significant overlap in their properties, indicating that the different processes might happen concomitantly. Finally, classical bulges and ellipticals follow offset mass–size relations, suggesting that high-mass bulges might not be simply high-mass ellipticals surrounded by discs.
Highlights
The central components of disc galaxies have proven deceptively simple
We showed that the Petrosian concentration index is a better proxy for bulgeto-total ratio than the global Sersic index
While bulge Sersic index can be considered as a criterion to distinguish pseudo-bulges from classical bulges, a more reliable, and physically motivated, separation can be made using the Kormendy relation
Summary
The central components of disc galaxies have proven deceptively simple. Even the mere definition of a galaxy bulge is still prone to debate. Bulges hold crucial clues to galaxy formation and evolution. Current views discern between bulges formed through violent processes, such as hierarchical clustering via minor mergers, named classical bulges, and those formed through longer time-scales, via disc instabilities and secular evolution processes, named pseudobulges (see Wyse et al 1997; Kormendy & Kennicutt 2004, for reviews). Given their dissimilar origins, it is naturally expected that these different bulge categories should be structurally distinct
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.