Abstract
AbstractWF6, ReFn (n = 6 and 7), and XeF6 combined with NOF to give (NO+2) WF, (NO+)2ReF, and (NO+)2XeF2–8, respectively. Also NO2F reacted with ReF6 to form (No2+)ReF2–8. Cs2XeF8·4BrF5 crystallized from a solution of Cs2XeF8 in BrF5. These five compounds were subjected to X‐ray structure determinations. The structure of [NO(NOF)2]+IF–8 was used as a standard for comparison. All anions exhibit square‐antiprismatic geometry, independent of their electronic configurations. Bond lenghts in ReF2–8 and XeF2–8 are larger than in WF2–8 and IF–8, owing to the presence of nonbonding electrons. Deviations from the ideal structure in XeF2–8 are attributed to cation‐anion interactions.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
