Abstract

We describe comparative patch analysis for modeling the structures of multidomain proteins and protein complexes, and apply it to the PSD-95 protein. Comparative patch analysis is a hybrid of comparative modeling based on a template complex and protein docking, with a greater applicability than comparative modeling and a higher accuracy than docking. It relies on structurally defined interactions of each of the complex components, or their homologs, with any other protein, irrespective of its fold. For each component, its known binding modes with other proteins of any fold are collected and expanded by the known binding modes of its homologs. These modes are then used to restrain conventional molecular docking, resulting in a set of binary domain complexes that are subsequently ranked by geometric complementarity and a statistical potential. The method is evaluated by predicting 20 binary complexes of known structure. It is able to correctly identify the binding mode in 70% of the benchmark complexes compared with 30% for protein docking. We applied comparative patch analysis to model the complex of the third PSD-95, DLG, and ZO-1 (PDZ) domain and the SH3-GK domains in the PSD-95 protein, whose structure is unknown. In the first predicted configuration of the domains, PDZ interacts with SH3, leaving both the GMP-binding site of guanylate kinase (GK) and the C-terminus binding cleft of PDZ accessible, while in the second configuration PDZ interacts with GK, burying both binding sites. We suggest that the two alternate configurations correspond to the different functional forms of PSD-95 and provide a possible structural description for the experimentally observed cooperative folding transitions in PSD-95 and its homologs. More generally, we expect that comparative patch analysis will provide useful spatial restraints for the structural characterization of an increasing number of binary and higher-order protein complexes.

Highlights

  • Protein–protein interactions play a key role in many cellular processes [1,2]

  • We find that comparative patch analysis increases the prediction accuracy relative to protein docking

  • We used comparative patch analysis to predict the tertiary structure of the postsynaptic density (PSD)-95 core fragment that contains PDZ3, SH3, and guanylate kinase (GK) domains

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In the first approach to modelling a target complex, standard comparative modelling or threading methods build a model using the known structure of a homologous complex as a template [7,10] The applicability of this approach is limited by the currently sparse structural coverage of binary interactions [6]. An atomic model is predicted by protein–protein docking, starting from the structures of the individual subunits without any consideration of homologous interactions [12,13,14,15,16] This docking is usually achieved by maximizing the shape and physicochemical complementarity of two protein structures, through generating and scoring a large set of possible configurations [13,16]. While docking is applicable to any two subunits whose structures are known or modeled, both the PLoS Computational Biology | www.ploscompbiol.org

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call