Abstract
ABSTRACTThe elastic T‐stress is an important constraint parameter for characterizing elastic–plastic crack‐tip fields and in fracture assessment procedures. However, many of the methods reported in the literature for estimating T‐stress are not easily suited for surface‐cracked pipes because these are three‐dimensional in nature. Here, the line‐spring method is demonstrated to be an efficient and accurate tool for the constraint estimation in surface‐cracked pipes. Detailed three‐dimensional analyses are performed to verify the line‐spring results. Using the line‐spring method, the effects of different crack geometries and diameter‐to‐thickness ratio on stress‐intensity factor (SIF) and T‐stress in circumferentially surface‐cracked pipes are examined. Further, a compendium of normalised SIF and T‐stress values for surface‐cracked pipes in remote tension and bending, calculated from a total of 1000 analyses, is tabulated. Finally, the application of an ‘elastic–plastic’ T‐stress under large‐scale plasticity is explored.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
