Structural inhomogeneities differentially modulate action currents and population spikes initiated in the axon or dendrites.

Abstract

Action potentials (APs) in CA1 pyramidal cells propagate in different directions along the somatodendritic axis depending on the activation mode (synaptic or axonal). We studied how the geometrical inhomogeneities along the apical shaft, soma, and initial axon modulate the transmembrane current (I(m)) flow underlying APs, using model and experimental techniques. The computations obtained at the subcellular level during forward- and backpropagation were extrapolated to macroscopic level (field potentials) and compared with the basic in vivo features of the ortho- and antidromic population spike (PS) that reflects the sum total of all elementary currents from synchronously firing cells. The matching of theoretical and experimental results supports the following conclusions. Because the charge carried by axonal APs is almost entirely drained into dendrites, the soma invasion is preceded by little capacitive currents (I(cap)), the ionic currents (I(ion)) dominating I(m) and the depolarizing phase. The subsequent invasion of the tapering apical shaft is preceded, however, by significant I(cap), while I(ion) decayed gradually. A similar pattern occurred during backpropagation of spikes synaptically initiated in the axon. On the contrary, when the AP was apically initiated, the dendritic I(ion) was boosted by the apical flare, it was preceded by weak I(cap) and spread forwardly at a slower velocity. Soma invasion is reliable once the AP reached the main apical shaft but less so distal to the primary bifurcation, where it may be upheld by concurrent synaptic activity. The decreasing internal resistance of the apical shaft guided most axial current into the soma, causing its fast charging. There, I(ion) began later in the depolarizing phase of the AP and the reduced driving force made it smaller. This, in addition to a poor temporal overlapping of somatodendritic inward currents within individual cells, built a smaller extracellular sink, i.e., a smaller PS. In both experiment and model, the antidromic (axon-initiated) PS in the soma layer is approximately 30% larger than an orthodromic (apical shaft-initiated) PS contributed by the same number of firing cells. We conclude that the dominance of capacitive or ionic current components on I(m) is a distinguishing feature of forward and backward APs that is predictable from the geometric inhomogeneities between conducting subregions. Correspondingly, experimental and model APs have a faster rising slope during ortho than antidromic activation. The moderate flare of the apical shaft makes forward AP conduction quite safe. This alternative trigger zone enables two different processing modes for apical inputs.