Abstract

This review problematizes the health and socio-economic disparity between Indigenous and non-Indigenous communities, which I argue is due to the role of the Canadian government. Specifically, I analyse the continuous process of Indigenous administrative subjugation under Canadian rule to uncover the intrinsic racial predilections of Canadian government policy toward First Nations peoples in Canada’s Prairie West provinces through the application of diagnostic frame analysis as a multidisciplinary research method to analyse how people understand situations and activities. My research results reveal the racialized marginalization of First Nation peoples through the administrative regimes in Canada as a continuous contemporary process established in the late nineteenth and twentieth century. In exposing the structural discrimination of First Nations peoples, my research introduces the reader to the concept of political master narratives, or ‘imaginaries’. These imaginaries foster the health and socio-economic disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous groups in Canadian society. The critical analysis of these historically structural government instituted imaginaries and the indirect, exponentially higher chances of tuberculosis and related diseases and deaths among Indigenous peoples’ challenge conclusions of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC) on cultural genocide. This study proposes structural genocide as a more accurate and inclusive term for the continuous institutional marginalization of not only Indigenous peoples as seen in this case study of the Department of Indian Affairs (DIA) but for all Indigenous peoples in Canada.

Highlights

  • Even though the Canadian government exerts an active health policy against TB and related diseases, Indigenous peoples still experience continuous health disparities relative to non-Indigenous people

  • In relation to structural genocide and the continued disparities between Indigenous peoples and “mainstream” Canada, can policies be blamed if scientific racism was perceived as the natural truth? How does scientific racism within Department of Indian Affairs (DIA) policy between 1900 and 1915 relate to treatment and policy toward Indigenous peoples today if we accept the notion of structural genocide? What does this mean for the continuity of these policies today and the question of institutionalized racism?

  • The continuous aftermath of structural genocide connected to contemporary health disparity shows how imbalances experienced by Indigenous peoples in Canada today are a result of historical displacement on reserves and the residential school system, which caused and continue to cause socio-economic poverty

Read more

Summary

Key points:

Marginalization of Indigenous peoples is a continuous process established in the nineteenth and twentieth century bureaucracy of Canada. Subjective and racialized historical concepts create health and socio-economic disparities between Indigenous and non-Indigenous groups in Canada. Structural genocide more accurately describes the treatment of Indigenous peoples in Canada

Introduction
History of Relations
Methods
Critical Analysis of DIA Annual Reports
DIA’s Administrative Bureaucracy and the Case Study on TB
Prevailing Diagnostic Frames
Results
Opposing Medical Views
Institutionalized Marginalization and Structural Genocide
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call