Abstract
Corrugated‐metal box culverts are employed as replacements for short‐span bridges. As a result of increasing use, there is a great demand for establishing a rational design procedure for these culverts. The available design procedures are based on experience or mathematical modeling. Only a limited number of attempts have been made to verify these design techniques with full‐scale field tests. Three corrugated‐metal box culverts were fully instrumented and field‐tested under similar backfill conditions and live loads. The first culvert was bulb‐angle‐rib‐reinforced corrugated aluminum; the second was rib‐reinforced corrugated steel; and the third was corrugated‐rib‐reinforced corrugated steel. The collected data were evaluated using a finite element analysis, and the applicability of standard design parameters was determined. Maximum bending moments obtained from field tests were compared to plastic moments calculated according to American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) specifications. It was concluded that the design for these types of structures can be improved if (1) Composite action is assumed; (2) thrust forces are included in design; and (3) construction procedures are controlled. The AASHTO specifications were conservative for rib‐reinforced, corrugated‐metal culverts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
